Determination of X‑ray shielding thickness in two tertiary hospitals in Kano metropolis, Nigeria

Article Sidebar

PDF EPUB

  Views | PDF/EPUB Downloads:
11 / 1 / 1

Published: 2019-12-03
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/wajr.wajr_28_18
Keywords:
Shielding, X-ray, XRAYBARR

Main Article Content

Aminu Abubakar Abubakar
Department of Radiology, Hajia Gambo Sawaba General Hospital, Bayero University Kano, Kaduna State
Mohammed Sidi
Department of Radiology, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Radiation dose depends on the total workload (Wtot) which is affected by the number of patients, tube potential, and tube current. Despite the increment in patients visiting the X-ray units under study and X-ray tube revolutions, changes have not been made in the shielding material to suit the current situation.
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the thickness of X-ray shielding barriers in two tertiary hospitals in Kano Metropolis using XRAYBAR software.
Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study and was undertaken from March 2017 to October 2017. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select two hospitals out of five. The two were named A and B, respectively. The minimum required thickness in each barrier was determined by XRAYBAR software.
Results: The Wtot (workload) for room I, II and III was found to be 199.9, 146, and 149.1 mA-min per week. The shielding barrier thickness required to reduce the unshielded radiation dose to the design dose limit for wall 1, 2, 3, 4, and operating console of the Room I was found to be 17.5, 5.5, 0.2, 0.00, 3.3 cm, that of wall 1, 2, 3, and 4 of room II was found to be 9.1, 3.4, 0.02, 2.3 cm, while for the wall 1, 2, 3, 4, and operating console of room III was found to be 12.3, 4.8, 3.8, 3.2, and 26.5 cm, respectively.
Conclusion: The calculated shielding barrier thickness from XRAYBARR code when compared to the design barrier thickness was found to be adequate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 26 No. 2 (2019): July - December

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Abubakar, A. A., & Sidi, M. (2019). Determination of X‑ray shielding thickness in two tertiary hospitals in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. West African Journal of Radiology, 26(2), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.4103/wajr.wajr_28_18

References

1. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21, New York: International Commission on Radiological Protection; 1991. p. 1‑3.

Available from: http://www.icrp.org>publicatio>id. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 07].

2. Martin A, Harbison SA. Introduction to Radiation Protection. London: Chapman & Hall; 1986. p. 85.

3. National Council on Radiation Protection. Structural Shielding Design for Medical X‑ray Imaging Facilities, Report 147. Bethesda, Maryland: National Council on Radiation Protection; 2005. p. 3‑14, 29‑48.

Available from: http://www.radiationproducts.com>pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 03].

4. International Atomic Energy Agency. International Basic Safety Standards for Radiation. International Atomic Energy Agency; 1996.

Available from: http://www.gnssn.iaea.org>safety_series_00. [Last accessed on 2017 Aug 20].

5. National Council on Radiation Protection. Structural Shielding Design and Evaluation for Medical Use of X-rays and Gamma Rays of Energies up To 10 MeV: National Council on Radiation Protection Report 49. Washington, D.C: Office of the Federal Register; 1976.

Available from: http://www.radiationprotectionproducts.com. [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 10].