Radiation protection measures of the radiological facilities in Kano metropolis, Nigeria

Main Article Content

M. Sidi
A. England
U. Mansur
ZI Muhammad
I. Garba
DJ Zira
U. Abubakar
A. A. Abubakar
A. Ya’u
G. Luntsi

Abstract

Introduction: The medical use of ionizing radiation contributes the largest amount of man-made radiation exposure and ranks second to natural background radiation. Adhering to the standard radiation protection measures minimizes radiation dose to patients, staff, and other public members.


Aim: This study aimed to evaluate radiation protection measures in radiological facilities in the Kano metropolis, Nigeria.


Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Kano metropolis, Nigeria, between February 2021 and May 2021. A structured questionnaire was formulated. The measuring tool was validated by expert and experienced colleagues. The reliability of the measuring tool was tested using a pilot study, and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient was found to be 0.815. A total of 101 respondents were recruited. These were the radiographers working in the functional radiological facilities. The obtained
data were analyzed using SPSS software version 23.0, and P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results: X‑ray room design was sufficient in the majority of radiological facilities 67 (66.7%). Insufficient availability of personnel protective devices in 47 (46.9%) respondents was observed. The majority, 24 (23.9%) of the respondents, indicated poor utilization of personnel protective devices. There was insufficient registration and records of radiation safety measures 26 (26.0%). Only 48 (47.5%) respondents indicated the availability of a QA committee in their facility. Fifty‑two (51.5%) of the respondents reported that they have
medical physicists/engineers available to provide support within their department, while only 25 (25.7%) had radiation safety officers in their facilities. There was a weak negative correlation between lead aprons and lead rubber gloves with the level of staff training, respectively (r = −0.254, P = 0.010; r = −0.214, P = 0.031).


Conclusion: There was sufficient X-ray room design in the Kano metropolis. An insufficient availability of personal protective devices, poor utilization, registration, and records of radiation safety measures was observed. There were inadequate QA committee and QC test in the majority of the radiological facilities. A weak negative correlation was observed between the use of lead aprons and lead rubber gloves with the level of staff training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Sidi, M., England, A., Mansur, U., Muhammad, Z., Garba, I., Zira, D., Abubakar, U., Abubakar, A. A., Ya’u, A., & Luntsi, G. (2025). Radiation protection measures of the radiological facilities in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. West African Journal of Radiology, 29(2), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.4103/wajr.wajr_4_22

References

1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effect of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR Report. Vol. I. Annexes A and B. NewYork, United Nations; 2008.

2. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effect of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR

Report. Vol. I. Annexes A and B. NewYork, United Nations; 2010.

3. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically guided interventional medical procedure; 2011. Available from: www.knovel.com/knovel2/Tocv.jsp?BookID=3876. [Last accessed on 2022 Jan 05].

4. Sidi M, Umar M, Ugwu AC, Nwobi C, Dare A. An evaluation of safety culture among radiation health professionals in Kano metropolis. Niger J Med Imaging Radiat Ther 2015;4:10‑20.

5. Mallam SP, Akpa MD, Oladipupo MD, Sa’id A. Reappraisal of existing expression for estimating radiation output from diagnostic x‑ ray machine. Niger J Phys 2004;16:30.

6. Sharma M, Singh A, Goel SH, Satani S. An evaluation of knowledge and practice towards radiation protection among radiographers of Agra city. Sch J App Med Sci 2016;4:2207‑10.

7. Do KH. General principles of radiation protection in fields of diagnostic medical exposure. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31 Suppl 1:S6‑9.

8. Joseph DZ, Peter E, Adejoh T, Gloria M, Goriya K, Abubakar M. Assessment of radiation protection measures in a Nigerian tertiary health care centre. J Health Med Nurs 2016;31:90‑104.

9. Eze CU, Abonyi LC, Njoku J, Irurhe NK, Olowu O. Assessment of radiation protection practices among radiographers in Lagos, Nigeria. Niger Med J 2013;54:386‑91.

10. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 2004;34:1‑73.

11. El‑Feky AA, El‑Sallamy RM, El‑Sherbeni AA, El‑Mursi H. Safety measures among workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation

in Tanta university hospital. Tanta Med J 2017;45:166‑74.

12. Eze KC, Nzotta CC, Marchie TT, Okegbunam B, Eze TE. The state of occupational radiation protection and monitoring in public and private X‑ray facilities in Edo state, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2011;14:308‑10.

13. Mohamed AT. Radiation safety awareness and practice in Sudanese medical facilities: A descriptive. Int J Sci Res 2015;4:2190‑5.

14. El‑Hady IM, Alazab RM, Abdel‑Wahed A, Ghandour AA, Elsaidy WH. Risk assessment of physical health hazards in Al‑Azhar university

hospital in new Damietta, Egypt. Egypt J Hosp Med 2013;53:1019‑35.

15. Tamijidi AM. Status of principles of radiation protection in radiology center of Bushehr province. Iran South Med J 2014;4:47‑52.

16. Rahimi SA, Salar SH, Asadi A. Evaluation of technical, protective and technological operation of radiologists in hospitals of Mazandaran medical sciences universities. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2007;17:131‑40.

17. Farzaneh MK, Mehmandoost‑Khajeh‑Dad AA, Namayeshi B, Varmal ZN, Mesgani M. Condition of observing the principles of radiation protection in radiology centers in Sistan and Baluchestan province of Iran. Int J Cur Res Rev 2013;5:82‑5.

18. Rostamzadeh A, Farzizadeh M, Fatehi D. Evaluation of the level of protection in radiology departments of Kermanshah, Iran. Iran J Phys

2015;12:200‑8.

19. Abdellah RA, Attia SA, Ahmed MF, Abdel‑Halim WA. Assessment of physicians’ knowledge attitude and practices of radiation safety as Suez Canal University Hospital, Egypt. Open J Radiol 2015;5:5250‑5.

20. Salama KF, AlObireed A, AlBagawi M, AlSufayan Y, AlSerheed M. Assessment of occupational radiation exposure among medical staff in health‑care facilities in the Eastern province, kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2016;20:21‑5.

21. Bhatt CR, Widmark A, Shrestha SL, Khanal T, Ween B. Occupational radiation exposure in health care facilities. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2012;10:48‑51.

22. Rose A, Rae WI. Personal protective equipment availability and utilization among interventionalists. Saf Health Work 2019;10:166‑71.

23. Ahmed RM, El‑Amin MA, El‑Samani M, Wisal B, Hassan W. Knowledge and performance of radiographers towards radiation protection, Taif Saudi Arabia. J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:63‑8.

24. Rahman N, Dhakam S, Shafqut A, Qadir S, Tipoo FA. Knowledge and practice of radiation safety among invasive cardiologists. J Pak Med Assoc 2008;58:119‑22.

25. Luntsi G, Ajikolo AB, Flavious NB, Nelson L, Nwobi C. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of nurses towards ionizing radiation during

theatre/ward radiography. J Nurs Care 2016;5:1‑5.

26. Sidi M, Abba M, Nwobi C, Dare A. Assessment of quality assurance program for conventional X‑ray equipment in Kano metropolis. J Assoc Radiographers Niger 2014;28:19‑24.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.