The value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis

Main Article Content

Dr. Ankur Mandelia
Arun Kumar Gupta
Devendra Kumar Verma
Sanjeev Sharma

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive radiological investigation, performed rapidly, and does not expose the patients to ionized radiation or iodinated contrast material. The present study was conducted to evaluate the role of MRCP in detection of common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.


Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 30 patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis based on clinical evaluation, biochemical, or radiological investigations. Ultrasonography and MRCP were performed in all patients. All patients underwent open surgery. CBD exploration was performed in all patients, either due to presence of palpable stones or due to the presence of dilated CBD (>7 mm). Demonstration of CBD stones intraoperatively was considered the “gold standard” for their presence, defined as stones visualized, and extracted or attempted for extraction during surgical CBD exploration.


Results: Intraoperatively, 21 (70%) out of 30 patients had cholelithiasis. 26 (86.67%) out of 30 patients had dilated CBD intraoperatively. In 20 (66.67%) out of 30 patients, choledocholithiasis was detected intraoperatively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of ultrasonography in detecting CBD stones in the present study were 65%, 60%, 76.47%, and 46.15%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of MRCP in diagnosis of CBD stones in the present study were 95%, 90%, 95%, and 90%, respectively.


Conclusions: MRCP is a noninvasive investigation without complications and has high sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values in detecting CBD stones. MRCP should be done in all cases with suspicion of CBD stones, where facilities and expertise are available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Mandelia, A., Gupta, A. K., Verma, D. K., & Sharma, S. (2025). The value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis. West African Journal of Radiology, 20(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.82235/wajr.vol20no1.237

References

1. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, et al. The value of magnetic resonance

cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:42‑7.

2. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 1999;54:604‑14.

3. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, Fried R, Zuber M, Harder F. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Management of Bile Duct Stones. Arch Surg 2000;135:148‑52.

4. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:1364‑6.

5. Liu T, Consorti E, Kawashima A. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected

choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480‑4.

6. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of

choledocholithiasis: Prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999;44:118‑22.

7. Abboud PAC, Malet PF, Berlen JA, Staroscik R, Cabana MD, Clarke JR, et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: A meta‑analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:450‑7.

8. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Biliary tract. In: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 17 th ed. Amsterdam: Saunders. Elsevier; 2004. p. 1597‑641.

9. Saltzstein EC, Peacock JB, Thomas MD. Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:381‑4.

10. Pereira‑Lima JC, Jakobs R, Busnello JV, Benz C, Blaya C, Riemann JF. The Role of Serum Liver Enzymes in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 2000; 47:1522‑5.

11. Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE, Tsai YF, Su CH, Wu CW, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1620‑4.

12. Cronan JJ, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, O’Connell RS, vanSonnenberg E, Wittenberg J, et al. Prospective diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Radiology 1983;146:467‑9.

13. Einstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, Halls JM. The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:725‑8.

14. Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW. Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:949‑52.

15. Cronan JJ. US diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis. A reappraisal. Radiology 1986;161:133‑4.

16. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Barkun AN, et al. Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation of MR Cholangiography for Diagnosis. Radiology 1998;209:435‑42.

17. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis – value of MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:847‑50.

18. Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Magnuson T. Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation with MR Cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1441‑5.

19. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis–diagnostic accuracy of

MR Cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997;205:523‑30.

20. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR Cholangio‑pancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996;199:91‑8.

21. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI, Chung JJ, Song SY, Kim KS, et al. MR Cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: Diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Radiology 2002;224:410‑6.

22. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314‑20.

23. Kats J, Kraai M, Dijkstra AJ, Koster K, Ter Borg F, Hazenberg HJ, et al. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography as a diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones: A comparison with ERCP and Clinical Follow‑up. Dig Surg 2003;20:32‑7.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.