Clinicians Opinion On Errors In Ultrasound Reports In South Eastern Nigeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated clinicians opinion on common errors in ultrasound reports in South Eastern Nigerian. 238 clinicians from speicialities of internal medicine, surgery, general practice and obstetric/gynaecology selected through stratified random sampling were invloved in ths survey. A questionnaire with four response options ranging from ‘very often’ to ‘never’ were used to obtain respondents opinion on the frequency of their observation of common errors in ultrasound reports. The commonest errors identified by respondents were conflicting report (3.73 + 0.62) and missed diagnosis (3.66 + 0.69). On a 4 point scale clinicians indicated that
irrespective of the common errors, the ultrasound report was still helpful. The overall mean rating of the clinicians on the extent of common errors in ultrasound report is 2.77 + 0.29. The response indicates that ultrasound reports in the locality are associated with significant errors.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to Cite
References
1. Agwu KK, Okoye IJ. A Survey of Infection Control Practices inMedical Ultrasound Units in Nigeria. West African Journal of Radiology. 1999; 6:17-19
2. Mckenzie GA, Mathers SA, Graham DT, Chesson RA. Radiographic Performed General Diagnostic Ultrasound: Current UK Practice.
Radiography 2000; 6(3): 179-188.
3. Bisset, RAL, Khan AN. Differential Diagnosis in Abdominal Ultrasound. Baillere Tindall London. 1990; 1:24.
4. Yamene Y. Statistics: A n Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper and Rov. Publishers, Inc. 1973;3: