Informed Consent: The Radiologist Administering Radiological Contrast Media
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study represents the understanding and practice of radiologists in Nigeria in obtaining informed consent from patients be foread ministering radiological contrast media. 120 questionnaires were sent to radiologists practicing in Nigeria. 78(65%) responded, 60(76.9%) of the respondents understood informed consent to mean informing a patient about a procedure and obtaining consent to carry out the procedure. Whereas for consent to be informed it must include the nature of the procedure, purpose, risks and benefits. 52(66.7%) obtained either written or verbal consent while 26(33.3%) neither informed patient nor obtained consent. However, all respondents understood that failure to obtain consent may result in possible litigation by patient or relative while 69(88.5%) requested for a specific policy regarding informed consent. It is concluded that the radiologist in Nigeria does not fully understand the concept of informed consent. A specific policy should be made by the appropriate professional body in Nigeria as to what constitutes the requirements of a truly informed consent since there are simply no guidelines for now. Also informed consent forms, simple enough for patients to understand should be designed. These will assist the individual specialist in the conduct of their practice.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to Cite
References
1. Ozsunay E, Akunal T. Informed Consent for Medical Interventions Under Turkish Law. Med. Law, 1998; 17(3): 429 35.
2. Lambert HA, Hopper KD, Matthews YL. Use of Informed Consent For Ionic and Non Ionic Contrast Media. Radiology.1992; 184 (1):145 8.
3. Ronald G, Grainger. Medicolegal issues in Diagnostic Radiology. Medicolegal Aspects Of Radiological Contrast Media. Chapter 10B, pg 13
18. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Philadelphia, 2002; 2nd Edition.
4. Schun k K. Rights and Responsibilities of the Radiologist in Determining Indications and Applying Radiological Procedures. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen bildgeb Verfahr, 1999; Jan: 170(1); 715.
5. Schlolender FF V Society of NY Hospital, 211 NY 125, 129 130; N.E. 92 93 (1914).
6. Keomaka V Zakaib, 811 P. 2d 478 (Haw C + App. 1991)
7. Leonard Berlin. Malpractice Issues In Radiology: The Duty To Disclose AJR 1998; 171: 1463 67.
8. Hopper KD, Housto PS, McCaulin MA et al. Patients Attitude Towards Informed Consent For Intravenous Contrast Media, Invest Radiol. 1992;
27(5): 362 6.
9. Lalli A. F. Urographic Contrast Media Reactions and Anxiety. Radiology 1974 112:267 71.
10. Duda SH, Holzer H. The Physian's Duty to inform in Interventional Radiological Therapeutic Procedures. Rofo Forts Chr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr, 1995; 163(4): 335-40.
11. Davidhizar R. Dowd S. Should Technologists Tell Everything They Know? Radiol Manage. 1997; 44 49.
12. Schlund G. H. Contrast Medium Incident From The Legal Viewpoint Aktulle radiol. 1996; 6(6): 348 52.