Perspectives of Nigerian doctors on the practice of rebates, fee-splitting, and kickbacks

Main Article Content

Dr. Bukunmi Michael Idowu
Mayowa Abimbola Soneye
Tolulope Adebayo Okedere
Stephen Olaoluwa Onigbinde
Aderemi Ishola

Abstract

Background: Fee splitting is a global pandemic in the health-care industry, whereby financial and nonfinancial inducements are offered to health-care practitioners in exchange for guaranteed patient referral, continuous patronage, or preferential usage/prescription of the payer’s products.


Methods: We surveyed 280 medical doctors from August 2017 to October 2017 to assess their knowledge, perception, and attitude toward fee-splitting using self-administered questionnaires.


Results: The majority (89%) of our respondents indicated that they were aware of the existence of fee-splitting in the Nigerian health-care industry. About 34% accept rebates, while 70% admitted to knowing other colleagues who accept rebates. The amount received as rebates was ≤20% of the cost of an investigation. More than half of the respondents (52%) opined that the practice is a nationwide phenomenon. An astonishing 78% of respondents either did not know (61%) or asserted wrongly (17%) that the practice is not a violation Nigerian


Medical Council rules. Only 46% affirmed that the practice is unethical. Compared to private hospitals,fee-splitting is less in public hospitals. Sixty-one percent noted that other health-care workers (besides physicians) are also involved. The primary allures of fee-splitting were a quest for an extra source of income (64%), poor/irregular salaries (60%), ignorance of its illegality (56%), and greed (47%). The identifieddeleterious consequences were unnecessary investigations/procedures, inflated health-care cost, quackery, delayed treatment/prolonged hospital stay, beclouded clinical judgment, and negative public perception.


Conclusion: Stricter regulatory enforcement and continuous ethics education are needed to disrupt the widespread fee-splitting culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Idowu, B. M., Soneye, M. A., Okedere, T. A., Onigbinde, S. O., & Ishola, A. (2025). Perspectives of Nigerian doctors on the practice of rebates, fee-splitting, and kickbacks. West African Journal of Radiology, 27(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.4103/wajr.wajr_19_19

References

1. Horwitz M. Fee splitting and rebates. Radiology 1948;50:545.

2. Chattopadhyay S. Corruption in healthcare and medicine: Why should physicians and bioethicists care and what should they do? Indian J Med Ethics 2013;10:153‑9.

3. Agbenorku P. Corruption in Ghanaian healthcare system: The consequences. J Med Med Sci 2012;3:622‑30.

4. Kale PA. An objective look at ‘cut practice’ in the medical profession. Issues Med Ethics 1996;4:19‑20.

5. Levin AV, Ganesh A, Al‑Busaidi A. Fee splitting in ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 2011;46:21‑7.

6. Davidson G. Payment for referrals. Psych Bull Australian Psychol Soc 1998;20:10.

7. American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 6.02‑Fee Splitting; 2001. Available from: http://www.ama‑assn.org/

ama/pub/physician‑resources/medical‑ethics/code‑medical‑ethics/opinion602.page? [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 05].

8. Armstrong D. MRI and CT centers offer doctors way to profit on scans. Wall Street J 2005:1. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/article/0, SB111498587452921637,00.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 22].

9. Manatt P, Phillips LL. Examining Fee Splitting Statutes in the Context of Value‑Based Healthcare. Available from: https://www.manatt.com/insights/newsletters/health‑update/examining‑fee‑splitting‑statutes‑in‑the‑context‑of. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 21].

10. Antoon JW. Is it unethical to offer incentives for patient referrals? J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:393‑4.

11. Dyer O. Six doctors are charged with taking kickbacks for sending patients to Chicago hospital for no reason. BMJ 2015;350:h22.

12. Jesilow PD, Pontell HN, Geis G. Medical criminals: Physicians and white‑collar offenses. Justice Q 1985;2:149‑65.

13. Schaffer WA, Holloman FC Jr. Consultation and referral between physicians in new medical practice environments. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103:600‑5.

14. Berlin L, Berlin JW. Leasing imaging facilities to referring physicians: Fee shifting or fee splitting? Radiology 2005;234:44‑8.

15. Reicher MA. Self‑dealing in medical imaging: Call for action. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:202‑7.

16. Campbell EG, Gruen RL, Mountford J, Miller LG, Cleary PD, Blumenthal D. A national survey of physician‑industry relationships. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1742‑50.

17. Rao JN, Cassia LJ. Ethics of undisclosed payments to doctors recruiting patients in clinical trials. BMJ 2002;325:36‑7.

18. Parsa M, Larijani B, Aramesh K, Nedjat S, Fotouhi A, Yekaninejad MS, et al. Fee splitting among general practitioners: A cross‑sectional study

in Iran. Arch Iran Med 2016;19:861‑5.

19. Bhat R. Characteristics of private medical practice in India: A provider’s perspective. Health Policy Plan 1999;14:26‑37.

20. Roy S. Refer a Patient, Earn a Commission. Available from: http://www.businessstandard.com/article/opinion/refer‑a‑patient‑earn‑a‑commission‑113071601111_1.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 12].

21. Mahawar KK. Cuts and Commissions: Exposing the Murky World of Indian Health Care. Available from: http://www.dailyo.in/politics/

the‑Ethical‑doctor‑Medicine‑corruption‑cut‑practice‑referral‑diagnosis‑hospitals/story/1/13219.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 12].

22. Korula RJ. Fee‑Splitting– the Unethical Side of Medical Practice Today. Available from: http://english.manoramaonline.com/wellness/health/ matters‑of‑the‑heart‑fee‑splitting‑unethical‑medical‑practice‑india.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 12].

23. Berger D. Corruption ruins the doctor‑patient relationship in India. BMJ 2014;348:g3169.

24. Rao GN. Medical Experts Seek Laws Against Cut Practice. Available from: http://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/

medical‑Experts‑seek‑laws‑against‑cut‑practice/59361888. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 22].

25. Rao M. Referral Fees or Bribes? Corporate Hospitals have Legitimised Paying Hefty Commissions to Independent Doctors for Sending Patients to Them. Available from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/referral‑fees‑or‑bribes/story‑gLpdw2zVOYEE5jaEqQgM8I.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 22].

26. Vora P. Indian Doctors are Bribing Colleagues, Ambulance Drivers, and Even Yoga Teachers to Get Patients. Available from: https://

qz.com/1021541/indian‑doctors‑are‑bribing‑colleagues‑ambulance‑drivers‑and‑even‑yoga‑teachers‑to‑get‑patients/. [Last accessed on 2018 Mar 22].

27. Mishra S. What ails the practice of medicine: The Atlas has shrugged. Indian Heart J 2015;67:1‑7.

28. Nagral S, Nundy S. We Need to End “Cut” Practice in Indian Healthcare. Available from: http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/07/07/ we‑need‑to‑end‑cut‑practice‑in‑indian‑healthcare/. [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 10].

29. Jih CJ, Soon LP. SMA advisory No. 01/2005. Medical Fee‑splitting among doctors. An ethics advisory from the 46th SMA council and the SMA centre for medical ethics and professionalism. SMA News 2005;37:9. Available from: https://www.sma.org.sg/UploadedImg/files/Advisories/medical_fee_splitting.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 02].

30. Merican IM. Fee Splitting (Malaysian Medical Council Press Statement 2 April 2010). Available from: http://www.mmc.gov.my/images/

contents/publications/2010/1‑Fee‑splitting‑Tan‑Sri‑Dato‑Seri‑Dr‑Hj‑Mohd‑Ismail‑Merican2010.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 23].

31. Philippines Medical Association Code of Ethics (Based on the PMA Board of Governors Meeting Held Last February 7, 2009, General Santos City); 2009. Available from: https://www.philippinemedicalassociation.org/downloads/pmacodes/IRR%20of%20the%20Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 11].

32. Turone F. Italian GPs suspended for accepting bribes. BMJ 1998;316:1264.

33. Turone F. Italian doctors face criminal allegations over bribes. BMJ 2004;328:1333.

34. Yu SY, Yang BM, Kim JH. New anti‑rebate legislation in South Korea. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013;11:311‑8.

35. Doval HC, Tajer CD, Borracci RA, Nuñez C, Samarelli M, Tamini S. Survey on ethical conduct thresholds in cardiological medical practice in Argentina. Dev World Bioeth 2015;15:68‑75.

36. Jain A, Nundy S, Abbasi K. Corruption: Medicine’s dirty open secret (Doctors must fight back against kickbacks). BMJ 2014;348:g4184.

37. World Medical Association. Statement on Conflict of Interest (Adopted by the 60th WMA General Assembly, New Delhi, India, October 2009

and editorially revised by the 201st WMA Council Session, Moscow, Russia, October 2015). Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies‑post/wma‑statement‑On‑conflict‑of‑interest/. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 22].

38. Hannah HW. Fee splitting, kickbacks, rebates, and commissions. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212:966‑7.

39. Barker RL. Fee splitting: A growing ethical problem. J Indep Soc Work 1987;1:1‑3.

40. Code of Medical Ethics in Nigeria: Rules of Professional Conduct for Medical and Dental Practitioners. Available from: http://www.

mdcnigeria.org/Downloads/CODE%20OF%20CONDUCTS. pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 22].

41. Soroosh G, Ninalowo H, Hutchens A, Khan S. RAD‑AID Nigeria Country Report; June, 2015. Available from: https://www.rad‑aid. org/wp‑content/uploads/Nigeria‑Country‑Report‑Final.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct 12].

42. Makinde OA. Physicians as medical tourism facilitators in Nigeria: Ethical issues of the practice. Croat Med J 2016;57:601‑4.

43. Nsofor I. Tangled Web: The Complicated Ethics of Medical Referrals from Nigeria to India. Available from: http://nigeriahealthwatch.

com/a‑tangled‑web‑the‑complicated‑ethics‑of‑medical‑referrals‑from‑nigeria‑to‑india/. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 12].

44. Anyanwu EB, Abedi Harrison O, Onohwakpor EA. The practice of medical referral: Ethical concerns. Am J Public Health Res 2015;3:31‑5.

45. Akl KF, Damra HS, Melhem MJ. Decline of the medical history and physical examination. Indian J Pediatr 2012;79:676‑7.

46. Fred HL. The downside of medical progress: The mourning of a medical dinosaur. Tex Heart Inst J 2009;36:4‑7.

47. Lysdahl KB, Hofmann BM. What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists’ perceptions.

BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:155.

48. Yousafzai AW. Corruption in medical practice: Where do we stand? J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2015;27:515‑6.

49. Chen XY. Defensive medicine or economically motivated corruption? A confucian reflection on physician care in China today. J Med Philos 2007;32:635‑48.

50. Buowari OY. Practice of defensive medicine. Jos J Med 2013;7:30‑1. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jjm/article/view/94214. [Last accessed on 2018 Dec 03].

51. Connell FJ. Problems of professional and business people: The morality of fee‑splitting. Linacre Q 1964;31:21‑2. Available from: http://epublications.marquete.edu/lnq/vol31/iss1/9. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 19].

52. Okoye O, Nwachukwu D, Maduka‑Okafor FC. Must we remain blind to undergraduate medical ethics education in Africa? A cross‑sectional study of Nigerian medical students. BMC Med Ethics 2017;18:73.

53. Stalin P, Thomas A. Medical students ‘perceptions about fee splitting for diagnostic procedures: A mixed methods research. J Res Med Educ

Ethics 2017;7:124‑8.

54. Thompson TL. Whistleblower Accuses Radiologist of Referral, Lease Kickbacks. Available from: https://www.auntminnie.com/index.as

px?sec=sup&sub=imc&pag=dis&itemid=67135. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 22].

55. U. S. DOJ Joins ‘Kickback’ Case Against Ohio Heart Centers. Available from: https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup&sub=ult& pag=dis&ItemID=80629. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 22].

56. Yee KM. California Doc Gets Jail Time for Ultrasound Medicare Fraud. Available from: https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup& Sub=ult&Pag=dis&ItemId=81633. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 22].

57. Casey B. Radiologist Nabbed in Calif. Workers’ Comp Fraud Sting. Available from: https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup &sub=imc&pag=dis&ItemID=112596. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 22].

58. Beverly Hills Doctor Sentenced to 10 Years in Custody for Massive Workers’ Comp Scheme. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/

usao‑sdca/pr/beverly‑hills‑doctor‑sentenced‑10‑years‑custody‑massive‑workers‑comp‑scheme. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 22].

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.