Evaluation of the diagnostic yield of ultrasound in the management of appendicitis: An experience in a tertiary hospital in South‑Eastern Nigeria
Article Sidebar
Views | PDF/EPUB Downloads:
13
/ 0
/ 0
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: In most complaints of right lower abdominal pains appendicitis is suspected. Appendicitis often creates the most common abdominal surgical emergency. Ultrasound and computed tomography are often the imaging modalities used to confirm the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in a tertiary hospital in South Eastern, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study design was adopted to study 152 records of patients aged 1–65 years who had ultrasound scans for clinical suspicion of appendicitis at a tertiary hospital in Anambra State, South Eastern Nigeria from 2016 to 2018. Patients’ age, gender, and provisional diagnosis were obtained from the patients’ request forms. Ultrasound results were obtained from the radiology department and the histology reports from the histology unit of the hospital. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS, version 22.0. was used for data analysis.
Results: Of the 152 cases, ultrasound was positive in 115, while histology confirmed 136 positives. Ultrasound, therefore, had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 84.56%, 100%, and 86.18%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 100% and 43.24%, respectively. The study showed a higher incidence of appendicitis among females (n = 84) than males (n = 52), (ratio 1:1.6). Age groups 10–19 and 20–29 years were the most affected. Accuracy was 91.94% (in males) and 82.22% (in females). The most common ultrasound features include enlarged appendix (>9 mm, 100%), rebound tenderness to probe (92%), and fluid-filled appendix (88%).
Conclusions: Ultrasound has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of appendicitis.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter‑Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc 2016;30:4668‑90.
2. Paterson‑Brown S. The acute abdomen and intestinal obstruction. In: Parks RW, Garden OJ, Carter DJ, Bradbury AW, Forsythe JL, editors. Principles and Practice of Surgery. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.
3. Bakheit MA, Warille AA. Anomalies of the vermiform appendix and prevalence of acute appendicitis in Khartoum. East Afr Med J 1999; 76: 338‑40.
4. Clegg‑Lamptey JN, Armah H, Naaeder SB, Adu‑Aryee NA. Position and susceptibility to inflammation of vermiform appendix in Accra, Ghana. East Afr Med J 2006;83:670‑3.
5. Denjalić A, Delić J, Delić‑Custendil S, Muminagić S. Variations in position and place of formation of appendix vermiformis found in the course of open appendectomy. Med Arh 2009;63:100‑1.
6. Ghorbani A, Forouzesh M, Kazemifar AM. Variation in anatomical position of vermiform appendix among Iranian population: An old issue which has not lost its importance. Anat Res Int 2014;2014:313575.
7. Paul UK, Naushab H, Alam MJ, Begum T, Rahman A, Akhter J. Length of vermiform appendix: A postmortem study. Bangladesh J Anat 2011; 9:10‑2.
8. Mwachaka P, El‑Busaidy H, Sinkeet S, Ogeng’o J. Variations in the position and length of the vermiform appendix in a black Kenyan
population. ISRN Anat 2014;2014:871048.
9. Oguntola AS, Adeoti ML, Oyemolade TA. Appendicitis: Trends in incidence, age, sex, and seasonal variations in South‑Western Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2010;9:213‑7.
10. Bornali H, Sekhar DR. A study on length of human appendix in different ages. IJHRMLP 2016;2:101‑6.
11. Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, Molodecky N, Ball CG, Chernoff GW, et al. The global incidence of appendicitis: A systematic review of
population‑based studies. Ann Surg 2017;266:237‑41.
12. Ahmed SA, Makama JG, Mohammed U, Sanda RB, Shehu SM, Ameh EA. Epidemiology of appendicitis in Northern Nigeria: A 10‑year review. Sub Saharan Afr J Med 2014;1:185‑90.
13. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol
1990; 132:910‑25.
14. Ayoade BA, Olawoye OA, Salami BA, Banjo AA. Acute appendicitis in Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu: A 3‑year
review. Niger J Clin Pract 2006;9:52‑64.
15. Freud E, Pilpel D, Mares AJ. Acute appendicitis in childhood in the Negev region: Some epidemiological observations over an 11‑year period (1973‑1983). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1988;7:680‑4.
16. Mostbeck G, Adam EJ, Nielsen MB, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C, et al. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: Ultrasound first. Insights
Imaging 2016;7:255‑63.
17. Humes DJ, Simpson J. Acute appendicitis. BMJ 2006;333:530‑4.
18. Saidi HS, Adwok JA. Acute appendicitis: An overview. East Afr Med J 2000;77:152‑6.
19. Abu Foul S, Egozi E, Assalia A, Kluger Y, Mahajna A. Is early appendectomy in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis mandatory? A prospective study. World J Emerg Surg 2019;14:2.
20. Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R. Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 2006;244:656‑60.
21. Matthew Fields J, Davis J, Alsup C, Bates A, Au A, Adhikari S, et al. Accuracy of point‑of‑care ultrasonography for diagnosing acute
appendicitis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2017;24:1124‑36.
22. Hobbs JM. Diagnostic imaging of appendicitis with supplementation by transabdominal and transvaginal sonog raphy. JDMS 2015;31:345‑51.
23. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158:355‑60.
24. Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Lewis FR. Acute appendicitis: High‑resolution real‑time US findings. Radiology 1987;163:11‑4.
25. Debnath J, Sharma V, Ravikumar R, Kumar R, Chatterjee S, Sampath S, et al. Clinical mimics of acute appendicitis: Is there any role of imaging?
Med J Armed Forces India 2016;72:285‑92.
26. Linam LE, Munden M. Sonography as the first line of evaluation in children with suspected acute appendicitis. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31:1153‑7.
27. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Appendicitis: Efficacy of color Doppler sonography. Radiology 1994;191:557‑60.
28. Crocker C, Akl M, Abdolell M, Kamali M, Costa AF. Ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of appendicitis: Accuracy with consideration of
indeterminate examinations according to STARD guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215:639‑44.
29. Paulson EK, Kalady MF, Pappas TN. Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2003;348:236‑42.
30. Mohammad GH, Afshin S. Diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis by ultrasound in hospital emergency. Int J Pediatr 2019; 7:1795‑802.
31. Waldman SD. Acute Appendicitis. Atlas of Common Pain Syndromes. 4th ed. Missouri‑Kansas, USA: Elsevier; 2019. p. 306‑10.
32. Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS. The etiology of appendicitis. Br J Surg 1972;58:695‑9.
33. Adamidis D, Roma‑Giannikou E, Karamolegou K, Tselalidou E, Constantopoulos A. Fiber intake and childhood appendicitis. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2000;51:153‑7.
34. Hugh TB, Hugh TJ. Appendicectomy – becoming a rare event? Med J Aust 2001;175:7‑8.
35. Sheikh Z. Acute appendicitis: Rapid response. BMJ 2017;357;j1703.
36. D’Souza N, D’Souza C, Grant D, Royston E, Farouk M. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Int J Surg 2015; 13:165‑9.
37. Dahabreh IJ, Adam GP, Halladay CW, Steele DW, Daiello LA, Wieland LS, et al. Diagnosis of Right Lower Quadrant Pain and Suspected Acute Appendicitis: Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 157. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), US Department of Health and Human Services 1. Report No.15(16)‑EHC025‑EF, December 2015.
38. Hayden CK Jr, Kuchelmeister J, Lipscomb TS. Sonography of acute appendicitis in childhood: Perforation versus nonperforation. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:209‑16.
39. Gwynn LK. Appendiceal enlargement as a criterion for clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Is it reliable and valid? J Emerg Med 2002; 23:9‑14.