The impact of playing wind musical instruments on the masseter muscles in a West African population
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aim: The morphological dimension of the masseter muscle is largely influenced by physical and habitual activities, which may impact directly on its performance. This study assessed the effects of playing wind musical instruments on the masseter muscle thickness in a male Nigerian adult population.
Materials and Methods: Equal numbers of male wind instrument players (WIP) were recruited and compared with nonwind instrument players (non-WIP) of the same age. Information on the sociodemographic characteristics, history, and type of wind instrument played was obtained. The masseter muscle thickness and fractional shortening were determined during relaxation and contraction using a linear probe of 7.5 MHz on ultrasound machine (Biosound Esaote MyLab40 Ultrasound machine; 2012; Italy, Rome). Reliability test demonstrated an excellent intrarater correlation (Cronbach’s alpha; 0.98). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results: The overall mean thickness of the masseter muscle at relaxation, contraction, and fractional shortening in WIP group was 9.21 ± 1.43 mm, 14.22 ± 1.95 mm, and 35.06% ± 5.07%, respectively, while 8.92 ± 1.12 mm, 13.97 ± 1.44 mm, and 36.08% ± 4.48%, respectively, in non-WIP group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups (P > 0.05). Type of instrument played, duration,
and frequency of play did not significantly affect the muscle thickness except for the number of years of play. There was also a significant right/left side dichotomy in each group.
Conclusions: Playing a wind instrument showed no significant effect on the thickness of the masseter muscle, however there was a significant increase in the muscle thickness with increasing years of play of wind instruments.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:39‑110.
2. Kossioni AE, Dontas AS. The stomatognathic system in the elderly. Useful information for the medical practitioner. Clin Interv Aging 2007; 2:591‑7.
3. Ingervall B. Variation of the range of movement of the mandible in relation of facial morphology in children. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:533‑43.
4. Jacobs RM. Muscle equilibrium: Fact or fancy. Angle Orthod 1969;39:11‑21.
5. Subtelny JD, Malocclusion, orthodontic corrections and orofacial muscle adaptation. Angle Orthod 1970;40:170‑201.
6. Vreeke M, Langenbach GE, Korfage JA, Zentner A, Grünheid T. The masticatory system under varying functional load. Part 1: Structural
adaptation of rabbit jaw muscles to reduced masticatory load. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:359‑64.
7. Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:659‑70.
8. Hell A, Walters F, Schreiber S, Blaise H, Bielke G, Meindl S, et al. Three dimensional ultrasonography in Maxillo‑Facial Surgery‑A new diagnostic tool. Int J Oral Maxfac Surg 1993;22:173‑7.
9. Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:682‑92.
10. Kiesel KB, Uhl TL, Underwood FB, Rodd DW, Nitz AJ. Measurement of lumbar multifidus muscle contraction with rehabilitative ultrasound
imaging. Man Ther 2007;12:161‑6.
11. Agnihotri A, Magu S, Dutta S. M‑mode echomyography: Functional assessment of the effects of thumb‑sucking habit on masticatory and
circumoral musculature. Oral Radiol 2010;26:71‑6.
12. Thilander B. Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:109‑20.
13. Kiliaridis S, Georgiakaki I, Katsaros C. Masseter muscle thickness and maxillary dental arch width. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:259‑63.
14. Harneet K, Tulika T, Priyank R, Anju G, Anup K. Influence of masseter muscle thickness on buccal corridor space and craniofacial morphology: A correlative study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016;50:207‑14.
15. Ogugua A, Clinton O, Edwin O, Ukoha U, Albert N, Chinwe E. Assessment of masseter muscle thickness in an adult Nigerian population: An ultrasound based study. Int J Biomed Res 2012;3:143‑6.
16. Satirogolu F, Arun T, Isik F. Comparative data on using, facial morphology and muscle thickness orthodontics, ultrasonography. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:562‑7.
17. Kubota M, Nakano H, Sanjo I, Satoh K, Sanjo T, Kamegai T, et al. Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:535‑42.
18. Park KM, Choi E, Kwak EJ, Kim S, Park W, Jeong JS, et al. The relationship between masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and facial profile in young Korean adults. Imaging Sci Dent 2018;48:213‑21.
19. Yamaguchi K, Tohara H, Hara K, Nakane A, Kajisa E, Yoshimi K, et al. Relationship of aging, skeletal muscle mass, and tooth loss with masseter muscle thickness. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:67.
20. Ruf S, Pancherz H, Kirschbaum M. Facial morphology, size and activity of the masseter muscle. Fortschritte Kieferothopidiae 1994;23:219‑27.
21. Soyoye O, Otuyemi O, Kolawole K, Ayoola O. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and overbite values in a Nigerian population.
Brazilian J Oral Sci 2017;16:1‑10.
22. Soyoye OA, Otuyemi OD, Kolawole KA, Ayoola OO. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre‑orthodontic treatment patients. Int Orthod 2018;16:698‑711.
23. Gotouda A, Yamaguchi T, Okada K, Matsuki T, Gotouda S, Inoue N. Influence of playing wind instruments on activity of masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:645‑51.
24. Black MJ, Schloss MD. Masseteric muscle hypertrophy. J Otolaryngol 1985;14:203‑5.
25. Arzul L, Corre P, Khonsari RH, Mercier JM, Piot B. Asymmetric hypertrophy of the masticatory muscles. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2012;57:286‑91.
26. Newton JP, Abel EW, Robertson EM, Yemm R. Changes in human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles with age: A study by computed
tomography. Gerodontics 1987;3:151‑4.
27. Rajaram P, Naidu M, Rao S, Venogopal S. M‑ mode echomyography: A new technique for the functional assessment of striated muscles.
Indian J Radiol Imag 2002;12:537‑41.