Postmortem forensic imaging: An essential tool in contentious cases
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Traditional autopsy (TA) is employed towards determining the cause and manner of death. Over the last decade, virtual autopsy (VA), involving the application of forensic imaging techniques have gained prominence and, with great precision in developed countries.
Aim: This is to compare the findings at post-mortem using forensic imaging techniques and, those of TA.
Materials and Methods: Post-mortem CT-Scan and MRI techniques were employed in the present case and for the first time in Nigeria, to identify the fatal injuries and determine their causation. The examination was done prior to the TA; the latter was done by a team of pathologists without the prior knowledge of the imaging findings. The results, using both methods, were subsequently compared.
Results: Most of the VA and TA findings were the same except for the areas that were not readily accessible to the pathology team because of prior embalmment of the body. The inexperience of the radiologist in the area of post-mortem forensic imaging also contributed to the few discrepancies.
Conclusion: This is the first virtopsy to be conducted in Nigeria and, with impressive results. The findings compare favourably with those of TA and, have the added advantage of identifying minor injuries that might easily be missed using TA method. Success is however hinged on the expertise of the forensic radiologist and forensic pathologist. While VA can be employed to solve the problems of religious opposition to TA, the cost of the former is astronomical.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to Cite
References
1. Hill RB, Anderson RE. The recent history of the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996;120:702‑12.
2. Morgan B, Adlam D, Robinson C, Pakkal M, Rutty GN. Adult post‑mortem imaging in traumatic and cardiorespiratory death and its relation to clinical radiological imaging. Br J Radiol 2014;87:20130662.
3. Stawicki SP, Aggrawal A, Dean AJ, Bahner DA, Steinberg SM, Hoey BA. Postmortem use of advanced imaging techniques: Is autopsy going
digital? OPUS 12 Sci 2008;2:17‑26.
4. Patowary AJ. Virtopsy: The non traumatic autopsy. NE Quest 2012;6:26‑35.
5. Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Filograna E, Cittadini F, Oliva A, Pascali VL. Computed tomography (CT) virtual autopsy and classical autopsy
discrepancies: Radiologist’s error or a demonstration of post‑mortem multi‑detector computed tomography (MSCT) limitation? Forensic Sci
Int 2010;195:E13‑7.
6. Wullenweber R, Schenider V, Grumme T. A computertomographical examination of cranial bullet wounds. Z Rechtsmed 1977;80:227‑46.
7. Stawicki SP, Gracias VH, Schrag SP, Martin ND, Dean AJ, Hoey BA, et al. The dead continue to teach the living: Examining the role of
computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the setting of postmortem examinations. J Surg Educ 2008;65:200‑5.
8. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ. VIRTOPSY: Minimally invasive, imaging‑guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics 2006; 26:1305‑33.
9. Hoey BA, Cipolla J, Grossman MD, McQuay N, Shukla PR, Stawicki SP, et al. Postmortem computed tomography, “CATopsy”, predicts cause
of death in trauma patients. J Trauma 2007;63:979‑85.
10. Yen K, Sonnenschein M, Thali MJ, Ozdoba C, Weis J, Zwygart K, et al. Postmortem multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance
imaging of odontoid fractures, atlantoaxial distractions and ascending medullary edema. Int J Legal Med 2005;119:129‑36.
11. Winegar BA, Murillo H, Tantiwongkosi B. Spectrum of critical imaging findings in complex facial skeletal trauma. Radiographics 2013; 33:3‑19.
12. Rhea JT, Mullins ME, Novelline RA. The face. In: Rogers LF, editor. Radiology of Skeletal Trauma. 3rd ed., Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 315‑75.
13. Cha JG, Kim DH, Kim DH, Paik SH, Park JS, Park SJ, et al. Utility of postmortem autopsy via whole‑body imaging: Initial observations
comparing MDCT and 3.0 T MRI findings with autopsy findings. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:395‑406.
14. Zerbini T, Silva LF, Ferro AC, Kay FU, Amaro Junior E, Pasqualucci CA, et al. Differences between postmortem computed tomography and
conventional autopsy in a stabbing murder case. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2014; 69:683‑7.