Gender Determinations by ultrasound in a Nigerian Health Facility: How Accurate Are sonologists?
Article Sidebar
Views | PDF/EPUB Downloads:
76
/ 6
/ 6
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: With the widespread use of ultrasound scan in pregnancy, there is a growing concern about the ability and accuracy of sonographic determination of the fetal gender.
Aim: This study aims to find out how accurate this is in a health facility in Port Harcourt, South Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out over a 2-year period. The birth gender of 750 women who were scanned during the index pregnancy and the fetal sex noted on routine ultrasound were compared to find out how accurate the gender was determined by ultrasound. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis.
Results: During the study period out of the 945 women who attended the antenatal clinic of the health facility during the study period, 750 (79%) had relevant scan reports from various imaging centers in Port Harcourt. The study showed that all sonographic sex determinations were made later than 19 weeks gestation and overall accuracy throughout pregnancy was 98.4%.
Conclusions: Gender determination by ultrasound which has a high accuracy in this environment also has a degree of failure. Thus the expectant mother and referring physician should be aware of its limitations and accuracy in our environment.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to Cite
References
1. Stocker J, Evens L. Fetal sex determination by ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1977;50:462‑6.
2. Chukudebelu WO, Osefo NJ. Preliminary experiences with the ultrasound at the University Teaching Hospital Enugu. Trop J
Obstet Gynecol 1980;1:83‑8.
3. Maaji SM Ekele BA, Bello SO, Morhason‑Bello IO. Do women want disclosure of fetal gender during prenatal ultrasound scan? Ann
Afr Med 2010;9:11‑4.
4. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Sex determination by ultrasound: Ethical challenges of sex ratio imbalances and invidious
discrimination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:245‑6.
5. Loblay V. Everyday ethics: Sex determination and ultrasound in Australia. Indian J Med Ethics 2009;6:188‑93.
6. Strange H, Chadwick R. The ethics of nonmedical sex selection. Health Care Anal. 2010;18:252‑66.
7. Pinhas‑Hamiel O, Zalel Y, Smith E, Mazkereth R, Aviram A, Lipitz S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of sex differentiation disorders: The role of fetal ultrasound. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4547‑53.
8. Chigbu CO, Odugu B, Okezie O. Implications of incorrect determination of fetal sex by ultrasound. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 100:287‑90.
9. Odeh M, Granin V, Kais M, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Sonographic fetal sex determination. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009;64:50‑7.
10. Elejalde BR, de Elejalde MM, Heitman T. Visualization of the fetal genitelia by ultrasonography: A review of the literature and analysis of its accuracy and ethical implications. J Ultrasound Med 1985;4:633‑9.
11. Odeh M, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Hypospadias mimicking female genitalia on early second trimester sonographic examination. J Clin
Ultrasound 2008;36:581‑3.
12. Hsiao CH, Wang HC, Hsieh CF, Hsu JJ. Fetal gender screening by ultrasound at 11 to 13(+6) weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
2008;87:8‑13.
13. Efrat Z, Perri T, Ramati E, Tugendreich D, Meizner I. Fetal gender assignment by first‑trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 2006;27:619‑21.
14. Adeyinka AO, Agunloye AM, Idris S. Ultrasonographic assessment of fetal gender. Afr J Med Med Sci 2005;34:345‑8.