Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Splenic Volumes in Normal Subjects in South-East, Nigeria.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The spleen is the largest organ in the reticuloendothelial system. Anthropometric studies using ultrasound suggest there may be racial or geographical differences in organ sizes and dimensions. Since some pathological health conditions affect the haematological parameters of the body organs, the spleen inclusive, there is therefore a need to establish a normogram of splenic dimensions for clinical practice in our environment. This has necessitated this study and also a determination of the effect of age, gender, body weight and body mass index (BMI) on splenic volumes for our locality as no such studies have been done in our environment to the best of our knowledge.
METHOD: Measurements of splenic sizes were carried out on 261 healthy subjects (142 males &119 females).i.e those without any history or evidence of splenic affectations or immunologic/haematologic disorders and whose age fall between 18 and 72 years. The length, width and thickness of the spleen were measured and using standard prolate ellipsoid formula of LxWxTx0.524, the volume of the spleen is calculated for each subject. The age, height, weight and body mass index Independent sample T-test was carried out for the subjects. Pearson's correlation co-efficient was calculated between the anthropometric parameters and splenic volume.
RESULTS: Mean splenic volume was 216.40±11,86cm. The age range of the subjects was 18-72 years, There was significant correlation of height and body weight with splenic volume (r=0.2,p=0.015). No significant correlation with age(r=0,07,p=0.4) or BMI. The male subjects had significantly higher splenic volume than females (241.22 ±13.16 vs 204.16±11.53 p=0.004).
CONCLUSION: Men have higher splenic dimensions than women. The height and weight correlated with splenic volumes but there was no significant correlation with age and BMI.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to Cite
References
1 Lamb P.M., Lund A, Kanagasabay R.K Martin A, Webb J. A, Reznek RH. Splen size: how well do linear ultrasound measurements correlate with thuse dimensional CT volume assessaneris? Br Radiol, 2002, 75573 577.
2 Lynn AS. Sonography of the Spleen. Journal of diagnostic medical sonography, 1987, 3:69-80
3 Marco P, Vincenzo M, Rosana L, Ernesto S. Robert M. Antonio S Guiliano F et al. Measurement of spleen volume by ultrasound scanning in patients with thrombocytosis. American society of Homatology, 2002; 99-4228-4230
4 Yetter E, Acosta K, Olson M. Blundell K. Estunating splenie volume: sonographic measurements correlated with helical CT determination. AJR,2003/181:1615-1620
5 Spielmarm L.A.Dkdeng M.D. Kliewer M.A. Sonographic evaluation of the spleen size in tall healthy athletes. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2004: 184-45-49
6 De Odorico Spaulding K.A. Pretorius D.H. Lev-Toaff A.S, Bailey T. II, Nolson TR. Normal splenic volumes estimated using three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1999 18:231-236.
7 Hosey RC, Mattacola CC, Krisa V Armsey T, Quarles J.D, Jagge J. Ultrasound assessment of spleen stae in collegiate athletes. Ir.J. Sports Med, 2006 40(3):251-254
8 Mustapha M.2, Tahir A, Tukur M, Bukar M. Lee W. Sanographic determination of normal spleen size in an adult African population. Eur.1 Radiol, 2009, 30(10): 1311-1315.
9 Downey M.T. Estimation of splenic weight from ultrasonographic measurements. Can Assoc Radiol 1,1992,43:273-277
10 Rodrigues A Rodrigues C),Germano M.A, Rasena 1,Cerri G G. Sonographic assessment of normal apleen volume. Clin Anat 1995,8.252-255
11 Pietri H, Boscaini M: Determination of splenic volumetric index by ultrasound scanning, Journal of ultrasound in Mocdicine 1984,3:19-21.
12 Messinezy M. Chapman R. Dudley J.M, Nunan TO, Pearson T.C. Use of splenic volume estimation to distinguish prinary thrombocythaemia from wactive thrombocytosis. Ear J Haematol., 1997,40:339-342
13 Loftus W.K. Chew LTC Metrewell C Sonographic measurement of spletnic length: correlation with measurement at autopsy. J Clin Ultrasound, 1999,27.71 -74
14 Prassopoulos P, Cavouras D. CT assessment of normal splenic size in children. Acta Radiol, 1994,35:152-154.
15 Henderson LM, Heymsfield S.B Horowitz 1, Kutner M.H. Measurement of liver and spleen volame by computed tomography: assessment of reproducibility anul changes found following a selective distal splenonenal shunt. Radiology, 1981, 141-525-527